Started with the bebop, but everything is connected
Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 11:40AM Sunday's Plain Dealer featured an article about Doan's Corners, Cleveland's "second downtown". This happens to be the neighborhood where my parents lived when I was born and was featured in the first piece,
44102 in my project Every Place I have ever lived - The foreclosure crisis in twelve neighborhoods. Every Place is currently installed at the Ohio Historical Society in Columbus OH and will be opening at the Argus Museum in Ann Arbor MI on September 28, 2012
In the 40's and 50's Doan's Corners was the home to theaters and clubs, including Lindsay's Sky Bar, one of the great jazz clubs. Turns out it was owned by the parents of one of my Precious Objects subjects
Bonnie D. Bonnie was a complete stranger to me when she participated. Friends keep on prodding me to do a project based upon my love of jazz music. While this remains to be done, I love the connection here. Lindsay's was gone by the time I became interested in jazz music in the early sixties. Pretty much the only club still open in the neighborhood was La Cave which featured folk music. I was lucky enough to hear the Stoneman Family and a very young Jose Feliciano at La Cave. The article also mentions the Jazz Temple which it wrongly locates. The Jazz Temple, only open for a couple of years, was located about a mile a way on the site where MOCA Cleveland is now being constructed. Another connection. While pretty young, I was able to hear some stunning music at the Jazz Temple an experience which certainly changed my life.
It too was featured in Every Place on the third piece in the series, 44121.
There is a clear line between Lindsay's, The Jazz Temple and the next club in line, Leo's Casino, when you chart the history of jazz in Cleveland. How fortunate for me that Bonnie, a friend of a friend, allowed me one more way to benefit from it.
Cleveland,
Doans Corners,
Jazz Temple,
Precious Objects 







Friend Chuck on Facebook
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....
Sorry for the obscure title. Recently I saw an exhbition that seemingly had everything. Graphically beautiful, impeccably executed, sound conceptual basis. I met the photographer who is clearly respectful of the people photographed and has gone to extreme lengths to execute the work. I should have swooned. But I didn't. Well I did but, was bugged about it. No matter how much I knew better, I could not get out of my head that I was looking at a butterfly collection. The work even had Latin series titles. We will not say who this is because the point is not a criticism of the work. Frankly, it is admirable work. The question is why did it still bother me and, is it important that it did.
There was a similar problem with The Album Project. I shrugged it off as the viewers not taking the time to get past their superficial impression and to learn why things were the way they were. I was asked (more than once) why he was cut out? I stole the idea of the blank backgrounds after seeing Jeffrey Milstein's terrific images of the bottoms of jumbo jets. One of the points of The Album Project is how Isaac's emotional state seems to come from nowhere. He has great difficulty telling you why is happy or, conversely, why he is upset. Removing the background was intended to show the difficulty of being with him, he gets upset, and you have no idea why. One person asked why it looked like product photography. That had never occurred to me. But, the comment is not unlike me thinking "butterfly collection."
One reviewer took the time to dig into my other work and into autism and completely "got" the project. Another reviewer was troubled by not being able to see the father/son relationship in the work. He wanted context.
Which brings me back to the initial question. If a group of portraits (the work at the beginning) looks like butterflies on pins, has the artist made a mistake? If a group of portraits (The Album Project) looks like the latest wrenches in the Sears Catalog?